
2005 Bourgogne Chardonnay: Wildflower honey on the very forward, pretty nose. Really incredible aromatics – white flowers, honeysuckle, anise and then a minerality and hint of seashells. Nice on the palate, not as rich as the nose suggests, a bit of alcohol, and yellow apple with fine persistence. Excellent wine for its appellation.
2004 Bourgogne Chardonnay: Much more restrained though with a hint of tropical fruits, some smokiness, toasted nuts, and the acidity present on the nose. Showing some oxidative qualities on the palate with great acidity and a touch of toasted hazelnut on the finish. Not as generous and harder to evaluate than above.
2005 Saint Romain “Sous le Chateau”: Similar aromatic profile to the 2005 Chardonnay; forward honey and floral components with a little oak present (though no new oak is used for this cuvee). Very delicate and more mineral. Nice palate of lemon zest with good acidity and palpable texture. Great balance. Pure and elegant. Really, very nice.
2004 Saint Romain “Sous le Chateau”: Gun flint and wet slate right off the bat on the nose with a hint of green and white pepper. Fat in the mouth (surprisingly more so than the 2005) and a little one-dimensional compare to the previous wine, but then the acid kicks in and gives it good lift. Curious.
2006 Bourgogne Chardonnay: (tank sample) lemon-lime and honey, with a bit of melon. Very fresh, round and seemingly sweet.
2006 Saint Romain “Sous le Chateau”: (tank sample) Showing very well, elegant, understated. Mineral driven with a hint of white pepper. Classically styled. I am convinced that these Saint Romains are of Premier Cru quality. Really refined.
2005 Bourgogne Passe-Tout-Grain: Ruby color with an expressive, though volatile nose of strawberry fruit and alcohol. Nice, light, very crisp, and refreshing. Blind I might have guessed it a white wine, save for the tannin. I guess even gamay grown around the village of Pommard has the characteristic Pommard bite. Despite the volatility, a nice example of its type. An interesting note on this— and somewhat perplexing—the following day when I tasted it, the volatility had dissipated considerably to be replaced by nice cherry fruit aromas. Usually the volatility becomes even more pronounced with oxidation…
2005 Pommard: Showing great typicity with cherry and medicine cabinet aromas. Sweet attack, a little volatile, and lighter in style but with a lot of grip. Nearly Volnay like elegance, but finished with that Pommard grip.
2005 Pommard “La Rue au Porte”: Reticent, with notes of red currant. None of the volatility as above, but then note quite as complex either. Very tight. Richer palate, good grip and great acidity. Hard to assess.
The next day: Earthier, with a bit of the rusty drain pipe about it. Mouth filling and firm. Very nice.
2005 Pommard 1er Cru “Les Fremiers”: (from a parcel adjacent to the Volnay 1er Cru of the same name and just south of Les Jarollières) Very pretty, complex, composed, and elegant nose of red berry fruits. A whisper of dried herbs. Very fresh, rich, full, and tannic. Very complete on the palate, though a hint of bitterness on the finish disrupts the nearly harmonious qualities of this wine. Very persistent. Delicious, but I do have some concern regarding the astringent tannins. If these integrate, it has quite a lot of potential.
2005 Pommard 1er Cru “Clos des Boucherottes”: (from Sordet’s Monopole vineyard on the other end of the village, adjacent to the Beaune 1er Cru Boucherottes) Tight. A bit of Mercurochrome, along with delicate raspberry notes. Full and rich with the right proportions of everything: oak, fruit, acid, tannin, and alcohol. Complex. Toasty finish. Complete, but needs time.
2002 Beaune 1er Cru “Les Chouacheux”: Volatile nose with a hint of banana. Not particularly alluring. Minerality noted on the palate. Tannic. Hints of toasted hazelnut skins. Too much structure (acid and tannin), not enough fruit. Simply too volatile.
2002 Pommard 1er Cru “Les Fremiers”: Showing consistently similar and frustrating volatility on the nose, though much more interesting on the palate. Certainly more tannic. Alcohol and raspberries. Again, not quite enough stuffing for the structure.
2002 Pommard 1er Cru “Clos des Boucherottes”: Again, consistent volatile element in the three 2002s, but definitely showing the best of the three. Sage on the palate. Still boasting big, unresolved tannins, though they are proving to be riper and suppler that the Fremiers. Touch of cedar. On the fence with these.
With Dinner:
1990 Pommard 1er Cru “Fremiers”: Really intense aromatics of milk chocolate, leather, game and barnyard. A tad maderized, but not in the least off-putting. Rich and full on the palate with good sweetness. Nothing thin about this vintage and none of the volatility of the 2002s. A very nice wine from an obviously ripe vintage. (1990 was Jerome Sordet’s second year at the helm of this Domaine, he handled it quite well if these two wines are any indication)
1990 Pommard “Clos des Boucherottes”: Great color, reminded me of the 2002, deep, nearly opaque. Still an adolescent and barely hitting its stride, it was reticent and muted on the nose. Earth and spice aromas emerged after some coaxing. Definitely a wine on which to reflect. Very rich, full bodied, and well balanced, but maddeningly closed. Hint of game and some walnut on the palate. Give it another ten years to come around and drink it over the next thirty.
